Notes From Afar

Month: October 2006 (page 1 of 1)

All My Data Are Belong to Google?

Google’s stated mission is “to organise the world’s data” well it’s dawned on me that they are doing a jolly good job with mine…

I’ve been Google as my search engine since it was launched.

I’ve been using Gmail as my secondary email account for a year or two.

I use GoogleTalk as my main instant messenging protocol as it’s the only IM client I have been able to install and get to work through draconian corporate firewalls in my last two employers.

I’m now using Google Calendar as my electronic diary as I can add/edit/update from both home and work and iCal can sync with it – although sadly only one way. Apple really need to add a web app interface of the quality of their new web mail to iCal for .Mac users.

I’ve just started using the updated Google Reader as my RSS feed reader as I can have a single set of RSS feeds that I can read at both home and work.

Update : since I started writing this I’ve stopped using Google Reader as it was just too slow. I’m using Newsfire again on my Macs but being frustrated by the lack of syncing betwen my Macs let alone with an online, visible at work, version. I hope that Google will create or open up and API for Google Reader that will allow offline RSS readers to sync with Google Reader. I know that NetNewsWire and NewsGator will do this but I like neither the online or offline part of that equation. I may go back to Google Reader yet.

So let’s see… I’m using five, yes five, Google products. So just how much of my data is now sitting in Google’s server farms? Possibly a little too much. With the exception of the whole China censorship thing I ‘trust’ Google as a corporate entity but I’m still starting to feel a little uneasy about how much of my data is ‘out there’ in the Googleverse…

So what is the solution? Stay offline? Don’t use web apps? Use multiple providers of web apps? Be careful what data you keep online in somebody else’s application?

Web 2.0 Thinking Game

Zeldman has a great post on what Web 2.0 means to different journalists and the wider interwebosphere™.

He’s created a great Web 2.0 thinking game to illustrate Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0; here are a few examples:

Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.
Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.

Put another way:

Web 1.0: New media company buys old media company.
Web 2.0: New media company buys new media company.

A few more examples:

Web 1.0: Writing.
Web 2.0: Rating.

Web 1.0: Karma Points.
Web 2.0: Diggs.

Web 1.0: Cool Site of the Day.
Web 2.0: Technorati.com.

Web 1.0: Tags.
Web 2.0: “Tags.”

Web 1.0: Bookmarking.
Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing.

Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets.
Web 2.0: Pointless “Ajax” widgets.

Head over to Zeldman now… the comments are very funny

Corporate Blogs

I’ve worked in two companies now where the idea of a blog has been mooted. I think corporate blogs are, on the whole, a terrible idea.

Unless genuinely written by an employee (who says it has to be an executive after all) with ability, charisma and genuine interest in blogging they are going to be shallow PR pieces that will die a fast and just death.

Remember kids… corporate blogs… just say no.

Gapingvoid

I’ve recently found and been enjoying this excellent blog so I thought I’d draw your attention to it.

gapingvoid is the blog of Hugh MacLeod and is centred around his cartoons drawn on the back of a business cards.

In addition to Hugh’s great cartoons he also posts some very interesting observations; I thought his post giving vs taking was a great explanation of Web 2.0 and it’s fundamental difference to the web I’ve worked in for all these years. It crystallises why the Web 2.0 movement, if that is the right term, has rekindled my love for the web.

So if I may be so bold as to suggest you add gapingvoid to your bookmarks or your RSS reader of choice and enjoy…